| WATER AND WASTEWATER DIVISIONS
Haverhill's Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Program
One of the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is for the City of Haverhill to implement a CSO program. The goal of the program is to improve the quality of the Merrimack River by reducing or eliminating combined sewer overflow discharges. Haverhill's CSO program includes the following:
CSO Outfalls and Regulators:
There are 23 CSO regulators in Haverhill that are connected to 20 outfalls. Of the 20 outfalls, five are located on Little River, and fifteen are located on Merrimack River Table 1 lists each outfall.
The CSO outfalls are all connected to the interceptor system via their own respective regulator structure. These regulator structures divert flow from the collection system to the outfall during wet weather when flow exceeds the hydraulic capacity of the interceptor. During dry weather, sanitary wastewater flow is conveyed directly to the interceptor system and, ultimately, to the WWTP for treatment.
What Are Combine Sewer Overflows
EPA Web site define CSO with the following definition:
“Combined sewer systems are sewers that are designed to collect rainwater runoff, domestic sewage, and industrial wastewater in the same pipe. Most of the time, combined sewer systems transport all of their wastewater to a sewage treatment plant, where it is treated and then discharged to a water body. During periods of heavy rainfall or snowmelt, however, the wastewater volume in a combined sewer system can exceed the capacity of the sewer system or treatment plant. For this reason, combined sewer systems are designed to overflow occasionally and discharge excess wastewater directly to nearby streams, rivers, or other water bodies.”
This picture represents a CSO regulator:

Many of the control elevations in the regulator structures have been raised. These new, higher elevations reflect a decreased wet weather overflow of approximately 10 percent and reflect the city's ongoing commitment to reducing CSO discharges. See the image
Table 1 CSO Outfalls - Click here:
| |
Old Weir Elev. |
New Weir Elev. |
Amount Raised |
NPDES # |
| |
|
|
(ft.) |
|
| HAVERHILL SIDE |
|
|
|
|
| LOWER SIPHON CSO |
|
|
|
|
| BATES |
9.4 |
9.4 |
0 |
001 |
| BOARDMAN |
9.3 |
9.3 |
0 |
010 |
| LOWER SIPHON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
013 |
| FIRE STATION |
13.5 |
13.5 |
0 |
016 |
| MAIN ST NORTH |
19.3 |
19.3 |
0 |
019 |
| MIDDLE SIPHON CSO |
|
|
|
|
| LITTLE RIVER NORTH 12-INCH |
9.25 |
11.77 |
2.52 |
021D |
| LITTLE RIVER SOUTH 18-INCH |
9 |
9.5 |
0.5 |
021E |
| Center Barrell Locke Street) |
12.92 |
12.92 |
0 |
021F |
| MIDDLE SIPHON |
6.2 |
7.7 |
1.5 |
021A |
| Emerson Street Eliminated |
|
|
|
021B |
| Essex Street Eliminated |
|
|
|
021C |
| WINTER ST |
27.02 |
27.02 |
0 |
21G |
| BROADWAY DIVERSIONAL |
35.77 |
35.77 |
0 |
37 |
| HIGH ST DIVERSIONAL |
28.32 |
28.32 |
0 |
38 |
| WINTER AND HALE |
17.9 |
18.6 |
0 |
21H |
| UPPER SIPHON CSO |
|
|
|
|
| RAILROAD BRIDGE |
26.4 |
26.4 |
0 |
022 |
| 266 RIVER STREET |
15 |
15 |
0 |
023 |
| BEACH STREET |
15.5 |
15.5 |
0 |
025 |
| UPPER SIPHON |
9.65 |
11.32 |
1.67 |
024 |
| BRADFORD SIDE |
|
|
|
|
| FRONT STREET |
14.25 |
15.58 |
1.33 |
031 |
| BRADFORD AVE |
11 |
12.75 |
1.75 |
032 |
| SOUTH PROSPECT |
11.48 |
12 |
0.52 |
033 |
| MIDDLESEX STREET |
6.48 |
8.56 |
2.08 |
034 |
| MAIN ST SOUTH |
8.21 |
10.38 |
2.17 |
035 |
| FERRY STREET |
5.75 |
8 |
2.25 |
036 |
| Mill Street Eliminated |
|
|
|
|
|
Why can't we reduce CSO impacts immediately? - Click here
Reducing CSO impacts is extremely expensive and challenging. Total separation of sanitary and storm sewers, although an option, is not economically feasible. Alternative approaches that have been used to control CSO impacts include:
- Storage tanks
- Storage tunnels
- Discharge control gates
- Treatment devices at CSO discharge points
Each alternative requires a great deal of planning and may be extremely costly. However, government authorities believe that through properly maintained and operated combined sewer systems, receiving water quality can be protected without separation.
|
What can you do? - Click here
Stay informed. The city of Haverhill wants the community to understand the importance of reducing CSOs. We will keep you up to date on Haverhill's CSO program.
Help us watch the quality of the river. If you spot floating material in the river or observe discharges to the river during dry weather conditions, please call 978-374-2382 so that we may correct the problem. Feel free to call Paul Jessel at 978-374-2382 or e-mail pjessel@haverhillwater.com with your concerns or questions about CSOs and the impacts. Your efforts will help us keep the rivers clean.
Meanwhile you can help minimize CSOs by implementing a recycling program in your own home and neighborhood. Everything that is tossed out into the street or poured down the drain enters the combined sewer system and during CSOs flows directly into the Merrimack River. By reducing the amount of toxic products in the home, reusing the product until finished or giving the product to someone who can use it, and recycling the container and contents, you can help improve the quality of our rivers.
|
Committed Actions - Click here
The city of Haverhill is committed to moving forward with programs that will clearly have a positive impact on water quality and use of the Merrimack and Little Rivers. Programs that will have an impact and those that the city is committed to include:
-
Construction of primary clarifier modifications at the treatment plant to ensure that process equipment is reliable and capable of treating existing and future flows as effectively as possible. This is the first step towards increasing wet-weather capacity at the treatment plant and thus reducing CSOs. $2 Million Completed June 2000
-
Design and construction of a new grit removal facility to provide more reliable operation of the primary clarifiers and associated sludge removal equipment during wet-weather conditions. $6 Million Completed in March 2006
-
Design and construction of upgrades to the plant influent pumping station, control gate, to allow for an increased plant wet-weather flow of approximately 60-mgd. $8 Million Completed in June 2006
-
Design and construction of miscellaneous plant improvements to accommodate an increase to approximately 60-mgd of wet-weather capacity including a new secondary bypass conduit and associated control gates, instrumentation, and separate disinfection diffuser in the bypass conduit. $3.5 Million completed in March 2006
-
Design and construction of miscellaneous improvements at the Bradford-side CSO regulators to reduce CSO discharges. These improvements include modifications to the Front Street, Middlesex Street, South Main Street, Ferry Street, and South Prospect Street CSO structures. $0.5 Million Completed in July 2006
-
Continue implementation of the nine minimum controls as outlined in the CDM report tiled “City of Haverhill, Massachusetts Wastewater Division Draft Report on Nine Minimum Control Measures for CSOs” dated September 1996.
-
Implementation of a CSO monitoring plan to further characterize CSO activation and to evaluate the effectiveness of the recommended improvements. The monitoring plan was submitted to EPA under a separate cover, dated August 1, 2002.
-
Continuing as an active participant in the Merrimack River Initiative and sharing in the costs necessary to ensure that a comprehensive, scientifically accurate study is completed. $0.1 Million. Phase I completed in July 2004 see the link below for the complete report. http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/projects/ma/merrimack/merrimack.htm
Implementation of the above, (total project costs of $20.1 Million) will increase WWTP capture to over 97 percent of all combined flows. In addition, these projects will reduce CSO discharge volume by 67 percent and allow attainment of water quality standards at the mouth of the Merrimack River during a 3-month storm. Click on the following link for the CSO volume reduction achieved after CSO construction completion. [http://www.ci.haverhill.ma.us/departments/water/waste_water/collection/cso/cso_summary_2006_with_changes.pdf]
Acting to control Stormwater pollution most effectively by investigating and correcting identified problems in the city’s storm drainage system that contributes to water quality problems in the rivers. Notice of Intent files in 2003 new permit shall be issued in 2008. See the link below for the City’s Stormwater Program. http://www.ci.haverhill.ma.us/departments/stormwater/index.htm
Beyond implementation of these eight programs it is recommended that no further capital investment be undertaken by Haverhill to abate CSO flows until such time as water quality data from the Merrimack River Initiative is available. As previously discussed, this data will establish bacterial quality of the river early on in the process to provide the CSO communities with information that can be used to provide a framework for CSO abatement decisions. If this data demonstrates that water quality and river uses are significantly impacted by Haverhill CSOs, and that there is a clear benefit to the river if CSOs are abated further, then investments should proceed as dictated by the study.
The estimated cost to capture the remaining 3 percent of the combine flows, is approximately $50- Million. The City is facing increasing regulations from the EPA on Stormwater, CSO, and Wastewater Treatment Plant loadings. There are limited funds to carry out these specific regulations as well as further CSO mitigations.
A clear plan for environmental restoration of the river is what is needed through targeted investments. This plan must be based on a full understanding of all the issues facing the river. This way the right investments can be made and the public at large can see the real benefit of these investment.
EPA official CSO web page can be found at the following link.
http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/home.cfm?program_id=5
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection MDEP official CSO web page can be found at: http://www.state.ma.us/dep/dephome.htm<
|
CSO Summary 2007
APPENDIX A: CSO SUMMARY CALANDER YEAR 2007
Before Weir was Raised
STRUCNAME |
fullname |
npdes |
events |
volMG |
hours |
| NLSIGTOF |
Lower Siphon |
13 |
4 |
3.6992564 |
9.37 |
| NMDH04W |
Winter Street & Hale St |
021H |
8 |
1.5098829 |
12.76 |
| NMESOF-D |
Middle Siphon |
21 |
6 |
4.2453488 |
17.64 |
| NMMSE3 |
Little River East |
021E |
10 |
3.6382122 |
25.87 |
| NMNS01B |
Little River West |
021D |
4 |
0.1885259 |
10.51 |
| NUSIGTOF |
Upper Siphon |
24 |
4 |
5.307434 |
10.51 |
| NUWS02WR |
River Street |
23 |
1 |
0.0035156 |
0.38 |
| SLSB08WR |
Ferry Street |
36 |
3 |
0.2727432 |
2.62 |
| SLSB10WR |
South Main Street |
35 |
10 |
0.9895068 |
57.76 |
| SLSB12WR |
Middlesex Street |
34 |
8 |
18.299244 |
1147.1 |
| SMSB01WR |
South Prospect Street |
33 |
4 |
0.2158354 |
9.38 |
| SMSB03WR |
Bradford Avenue |
32 |
12 |
5.3050479 |
37.88 |
| SUSB02WR |
Front Street |
31 |
5 |
1.2761553 |
15.01 |
| NLRS28WR |
Bates Bridge |
1 |
|
|
|
| NUMN04WR |
Beach Street |
25 |
|
|
|
| NLRS04WR |
Boardman Street |
10 |
|
|
|
| NLWS09WR |
Fire Station |
16 |
|
|
|
| NLMI12WR |
Mill Street |
--- |
|
|
|
| NLWS13OF |
Main Street - North |
19 |
|
|
|
| NUWS09OF |
Railroad Bridge |
22 |
|
|
|
| NMBR02W |
Broadway Regulator |
|
|
|
|
| NMHI01W |
High Street Regulator |
38 |
|
|
|
| Totals: |
|
|
|
44.950708 |
|
After Weir Was Raised
STRUCNAME |
fullname |
npdes |
events |
volMG |
hours |
| NLSIGTOF |
Lower Siphon |
13 |
2 |
0.7751524 |
2.62 |
| NMDH04W |
Winter Street & Hale St |
021H |
4 |
0.1201438 |
3 |
| NMESOF-D |
Middle Siphon |
21 |
2 |
0.5697516 |
4.5 |
| NMMSE3 |
Little River East |
021E |
5 |
0.8823857 |
7.86 |
| NMNS01B |
Little River West |
021D |
2 |
0.036076 |
2.62 |
| NUSIGTOF |
Upper Siphon |
24 |
2 |
0.724812 |
3 |
| NUWS02WR |
River Street |
23 |
1 |
0.0035156 |
0.38 |
| SLSB08WR |
Ferry Street |
36 |
2 |
0.0149376 |
1.5 |
| SLSB10WR |
South Main Street |
35 |
2 |
0.2183412 |
3.38 |
| SLSB12WR |
Middlesex Street |
34 |
4 |
6.1829755 |
111 |
| SMSB01WR |
South Prospect Street |
33 |
2 |
0.0277732 |
2.62 |
| SMSB03WR |
Bradford Avenue |
32 |
6 |
1.8565285 |
21 |
| SUSB02WR |
Front Street |
31 |
2 |
0.111826 |
3.38 |
| NLRS28WR |
Bates Bridge |
1 |
|
|
|
| NUMN04WR |
Beach Street |
25 |
|
|
|
| NLRS04WR |
Boardman Street |
10 |
|
|
|
| NLWS09WR |
Fire Station |
16 |
|
|
|
| NLMI12WR |
Mill Street |
--- |
|
|
|
| NLWS13OF |
Main Street - North |
19 |
|
|
|
| NUWS09OF |
Railroad Bridge |
22 |
|
|
|
| NMBR02W |
Broadway Regulator |
|
|
|
|
| NMHI01W |
High Street Regulator |
38 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
11.524219 |
|
| CSO Total Calendar |
YEAR 2007 |
|
|
56.47 |
MG |
If Weir Was Raised For The Entire Year
STRUCNAME |
fullname |
npdes |
events |
volMG |
hours |
| NLSIGTOF |
Lower Siphon |
13 |
6 |
5.5601308 |
12.74 |
| NMDH04W |
Winter Street & Hale St |
021H |
12 |
1.6295778 |
15.76 |
| NMESOF-D |
Middle Siphon |
21 |
8 |
4.9189976 |
22.14 |
| NMMSE3 |
Little River East |
021E |
15 |
4.5217498 |
33.73 |
| NMNS01B |
Little River West |
021D |
6 |
0.2202187 |
13.13 |
| NUSIGTOF |
Upper Siphon |
24 |
6 |
6.0275336 |
13.89 |
| NUWS02WR |
River Street |
23 |
1 |
0.0035156 |
0.38 |
| SLSB08WR |
Ferry Street |
36 |
5 |
0.2874714 |
4.12 |
| SLSB10WR |
South Main Street |
35 |
12 |
1.207474 |
61.14 |
| SLSB12WR |
Middlesex Street |
34 |
10 |
18.337011 |
1150.9 |
| SMSB01WR |
South Prospect Street |
33 |
6 |
0.2422847 |
11.63 |
| SMSB03WR |
Bradford Avenue |
32 |
18 |
7.1756986 |
58.88 |
| SUSB02WR |
Front Street |
31 |
7 |
1.4751158 |
18.39 |
| NLRS28WR |
Bates Bridge |
1 |
|
|
|
| NUMN04WR |
Beach Street |
25 |
|
|
|
| NLRS04WR |
Boardman Street |
10 |
|
|
|
| NLWS09WR |
Fire Station |
16 |
|
|
|
| NLMI12WR |
Mill Street |
--- |
|
|
|
| NLWS13OF |
Main Street - North |
19 |
|
|
|
| NUWS09OF |
Railroad Bridge |
22 |
|
|
|
| NMBR02W |
Broadway Regulator |
|
|
|
|
| NMHI01W |
High Street Regulator |
38 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
51.606779 |
1416.8 |
| CSO Total |
|
|
|
51.61 |
MG |
|
|